 |
FAQ : Connectivity (Tunnels and Subnets) : IPv6 Transition Mechanism / Tunneling Comparison
IPv6 Transition Mechanism / Tunneling Comparison
Find below a small feature comparison of the various IPv6 transition mechanisms that exist and are in use on the Internet. The various items are color coded to highlight 'positive' and 'negative' things in a protocol. Depending on where one is applying a mechanism and what ones requirements are, these can have advantages or disadvantages.
| Name | Protocol | Dynamic endpoint supported | Address Space used | IPv6 over IPv4 | IPv4 over IPv6 | Packet Overhead | Multicast | NAT traversal | Reverse DNS 8 | Authentication 11 | Prefix Delegation | Traffic Accounting | SixXS specific9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supported by AICCU | Available on SixXS PoPs | Costs credits when down | |||||||||||||
| 6in4 (static) | proto-41 | N | any | Y | - | Minimum | O | N1 | O | N | O | O | Y | Y | Y |
| 6in4-heartbeat | proto-41 | Y5 | any | Y | - | Minimum | O | N1 | O | Y | O | O | Y | Y | N |
| 6rd | proto-41 | Y | any | Y | - | Minimum | O | N1 | O | N | O | O | - | N | - |
| 6to4 | proto-41 | Y2 | 2002::/16 | Y | - | Minimum | N | N | O | N | /48 | N | N | N | - |
| AYIYA | AYIYA (udp) | Y5 | any | Y | Y | High | O | Y | O | Y | O | O | Y | Y | N |
| ISATAP | ISATAP (udp) | Y4 | any | Y | - | Medium | N | N | O | N | N | O | N6 | N | - |
| L2TP | L2TP (udp) | Y4 | any | Y | Y | High | O | Y | O | Y | O | O | Y | N | - |
| TSP/DSTM | DSTM | Y4 | any | N | Y | High | O | - | O | Y | O | O | N | N | - |
| TSP/UDPv6 | UDPv6 (udp) | Y4 | any | Y | Y | Medium | O | Y | O | Y | O | O | N7 | N | - |
| Teredo | Teredo (udp) | Y2 | 2001::/323 | Y | - | High | N | Y10 | N | N | N | N | - | N | - |
'Y' = Yes, 'O' = Optional, 'N' = No, 'C' = Configuration only, '-' = Not applicable
1 = Unless the machine performing the NAT function is configured to forward protocol 41 to the actual endpoint or when the NAT supports proto-41 because it keeps state for outbound proto-41 packets and relies on that information.
2 = IPv6 prefix will change when IPv4 address changes.
3 = Can be configured to use a different address space.
4 = Requires full renegotation of the tunnel setup.
5 = Heartbeats in the protocol, thus per-packet tunnel moving.
6 = ISATAP is supported natively by most Operating Systems.
7 = Functionality is in development, it is supported by the GoGo6 TSP Client.
8 = Delegation needs to be made from the ISP, for 6to4 one has to request it from NRO 6to4 reverse service.
9 = AICCU + SixXS Specific columns are not given green/red color as these are not related to featureset of the protocol.
10 = Only non-symmetric NATs
11 = Authentication: N = None; Y = Yes, guest accounts can be used to used to provide anonymous access.
With Teredo and 6to4 there is a likely chance that the IPv6 address will change, especially when the underlying IPv4 address of the tunnel endpoint changes. For all other protocols it depends on the TIC or TSP protocol and the policy on which addresses are given for the tunnels if the addresses remain the same/static.
Other IPv6 transition mechanisms, not listed in the above table:
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| IVI | The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition |
| 6over4 | uses IPv4 multicast as a tunneling medium, not used in common deployed scenarios |
| SIIT | Simple IP/ICMP Transition |
| SOCKS | SOCKS is a proxy/gateway mechanism, very useful in sitations where SOCKS is already used |
| NAT-PT | Network Address Translation-Protocol Transition (deprecated) |
Like everything at SixXS, comments/questions/updates/notes, then contact the Staff
|
©2001-2010 SixXS - IPv6 Deployment & Tunnel Broker Last revision: Sun 24 Jan 2010 23:02:42 CET |
